Planning appeal decision
39 Stothard Road, Bristol, BS7 9XL
Planning appeal 3273297 at 39 Stothard Road, Bristol, BS7 9XL (Bristol City Council) was dismissed on 29 October 2021 by Inspector Sutton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
Planning application for residential development to rear of at 12 and 14 Eastlake Close and 39 Stothard Road, Lockleaze, Bristol, BS7 9XL
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sutton A
- Postcode
- BS7 9XL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for the occupants of No 39 and future occupants of the proposed dwellings with regards private garden space
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupants of the proposed dwellings with regards outlook
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of 37 and 39 Stothard Road and 12 Eastlake Close, with regards noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of 22 and 24 Hogarth Walk, with regards privacy, light and outlook
What decided it
The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area and the significant harm to living conditions of both future and neighbouring occupants, which significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing delivery, even when the tilted balance under paragraph 11 of the Framework is applied.
The modest benefits of four dwellings in a sustainable location and the support for boosting housing supply were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance and the significant harm to living conditions of future and neighbouring occupants, with the design policies of the development plan given very substantial weight as they are consistent with the Framework's approach to good design and high-quality places.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Strategy Policy BCS18Core Strategy Policy BCS21Local Plan Policy DM14Local Plan Policy DM21Local Plan Policy DM26Local Plan Policy DM27Local Plan Policy DM28Local Plan Policy DM29
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 134
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bristol City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed27 October 20266010371128 Church Road, Bristol, BS5 9HH
- Allowed22 October 20266011341172 Filton Avenue, Filton, Bristol, BS7 0AX
- Dismissed19 October 2026601047046 Berkeley Road, Speedwell, Bristol, BS16 3NB
- Dismissed12 August 20266005564Chasefield House, 888 Fishponds Road, Bristol, BS16 3XB
- Dismissed30 July 20266007591163A Church Road, Redfield, Bristol, BS5 9LA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®