Planning appeal decision
Chasefield House, 888 Fishponds Road, Bristol, BS16 3XB
Planning appeal 6005564 at Chasefield House, 888 Fishponds Road, Bristol, BS16 3XB (Bristol City Council) was dismissed on 12 August 2026 by Inspector S Sharp, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the cedar tree within the site, and its contribution as green infrastructure to the character and appearance of the site and its surroundings, including the Stapleton and Frome Valley Conservation Area.
the demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide 5 dwellings with associated access improvements; parking; hard/soft landscape works and drainage
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- S Sharp
- Postcode
- BS16 3XB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the cedar tree within the site, and its contribution as green infrastructure to the character and appearance of the site and its surroundings, including the Stapleton and Frome Valley Conservation Area
- the living conditions of occupiers of Eaton Close in relation to outlook
- the living conditions of occupiers of Laburnum Grove and Chasefield Lane in relation to noise and disturbance associated with vehicular traffic travelling to and from the site
- biodiversity including whether biodiversity net gain (BNG) can be delivered
- highway safety specifically in relation to the proposed use of Chasefield Lane for access and the junction of Chasefield Lane and Fishponds Road
- the balance and mix of dwellings available in the area
What decided it
The harm to the significance of the conservation area through the likely loss or reduction of the cedar tree, combined with significant harm to neighbouring living conditions, provides a strong reason for refusal that outweighs the public benefits of housing supply in an area with a shortfall.
The public benefits of housing supply in an area with unfulfilled need, construction employment and economic benefits were afforded minor weight and did not outweigh the moderate less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area and the significant harm to neighbouring living conditions; the harm to the conservation area provided a strong reason for refusal under NPPF paragraph 11d)i).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- BCS5BCS9BCS10BCS18BCS20BCS21BCS22DM3DM15DM17DM19DM21DM23DM26DM29DM31DM32
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bristol City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 20266010371128 Church Road, Bristol, BS5 9HH
- Allowed22 October 20266011341172 Filton Avenue, Filton, Bristol, BS7 0AX
- Dismissed19 October 2026601047046 Berkeley Road, Speedwell, Bristol, BS16 3NB
- Dismissed30 July 20266007591163A Church Road, Redfield, Bristol, BS5 9LA
- Dismissed6 July 2026600390730 Oxford Street, Totterdown, Bristol, BS3 4RJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®