Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 September 20213273431

112 Madrid Road, London, SW13 9PG

Planning appeal 3273431 at 112 Madrid Road, London, SW13 9PG (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 September 2021 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area, including upon the setting of the Castlenau Conservation Area and whether the proposed development would either preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Madrid Road Conservation Area.

Addition of a room above existing garage. Room for hobbies, gym

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
SW13 9PG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area, including upon the setting of the Castlenau Conservation Area and whether the proposed development would either preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Madrid Road Conservation Area

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the Madrid Road Conservation Area and the setting of the Castlenau Conservation Area was not outweighed by the small cumulative public benefits of the scheme.

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the conservation areas and their settings was not outweighed by the small benefits of increased accommodation and minor economic gains.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

583 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.