Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 October 20213273592

1 Emerson Mews, New Malden, KT3 3BG

prior approval for the construction of a two-storey extension on a detached block of flats at 1 Emerson Mews, New Malden, KT3 3BG. The proposal complies with Schedule 2 part 2 class A of the General Permitted Development Order (2020) which took effect on the 1st August 2020

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Britnell S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the external appearance of the building
  • the impact on the amenity of the neighbouring premises at Nos 2, 3 and 4 Emerson Mews and 49 Montem Road with particular regard to outlook and privacy and in the case of 49 Montem Road, with regard also to daylight and sunlight
  • the transport and highways impacts of the proposed development

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the external appearance of the building, the living conditions of neighbouring occupants through overbearing impact, loss of privacy and daylight, and highway safety through increased parking pressure.

Framework references: 130, 134, 111, 112

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.