Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 January 20223273768

Robin Hood Way (A3), Kingston Vale, London, SW15 3PW

Planning appeal 3273768 at Robin Hood Way (A3), Kingston Vale, London, SW15 3PW (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was allowed on 28 January 2022 by Inspector MacLeod R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the street scene, on a designated Strategic Area of Special Character (SASC) and on an adjacent area of Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed.

installation of a 20m Phase 8 monopole tower with wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
MacLeod R
Postcode
SW15 3PW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the street scene, on a designated Strategic Area of Special Character (SASC) and on an adjacent area of Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed

What decided it

The public benefit of 5G coverage rollout and mast sharing for the Emergency Services Network, combined with the acceptable siting and appearance of the monopole in its context, outweighs any harm to the Strategic Area of Special Character.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS8DM5DM10DM12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

45 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed22 May 20243325272
    Jubilee Way, Chessington, Surrey, KT9 1TR
  2. Dismissed13 March 20243323347
    Area of Footpath, King Charles' Road, Oakhill Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT5 9BE
  3. Allowed14 September 20233305150
    Pavement O/S 79 Clarence St, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT1 1RB
  4. Allowed14 September 20233305031
    Church Road Street Works, Church Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT4 7EW
  5. Dismissed5 September 20233280478
    Area of Footpath, Kingston Hill, Coombe, Kingston, KT2 7JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.