Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 September 20233280478

Area of Footpath, Kingston Hill, Coombe, Kingston, KT2 7JP

Planning appeal 3280478 at Area of Footpath, Kingston Hill, Coombe, Kingston, KT2 7JP (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 5 September 2023 by Inspector Parkin A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternative locations.

5G telecoms installation: 15m high streetpole and 3no cabinets with ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Change of use
Inspector
Parkin A
Postcode
KT2 7JP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternative locations

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the proposed mast would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of the locally listed building, and the appellant failed to demonstrate that the need for this location outweighed that harm or that no more suitable alternative sites were available.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS8DM10DM12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 114Paragraph 202Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

181 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed22 May 20243325272
    Jubilee Way, Chessington, Surrey, KT9 1TR
  2. Dismissed13 March 20243323347
    Area of Footpath, King Charles' Road, Oakhill Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT5 9BE
  3. Allowed14 September 20233305150
    Pavement O/S 79 Clarence St, , Kingston Upon Thames , KT1 1RB
  4. Allowed14 September 20233305031
    Church Road Street Works, Church Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT4 7EW
  5. Dismissed23 June 20233299291
    Area of Existing Footpath off Palace Road Close to Junction With Portsmouth Road, Surbiton, London, KT1 2BF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.