Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 June 20233299291

Area of existing footpath off Palace Road close to junction with Portsmouth Road, Surbiton, London, KT1 2BF

described on the application form as ‘proposed 5G telecoms installation: H3G Phase 8 15m high street pole c/w wrap-around cabinet and 3 further additional equipment cabinets

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the Riverside South Conservation Area

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the appeal site represented the least harmful option available, as the assessment of alternative sites lacked sufficient detail and no evidence of surveys of nearby buildings had been undertaken to rule out site-sharing opportunities.

Framework references: 114, 117, 202

Plan policies cited: CS8, DM10, DM12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.