Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 November 20213273771

142 Ilford Lane, Ilford, Essex, IG1 2LG

Planning appeal 3273771 at 142 Ilford Lane, Ilford, Essex, IG1 2LG (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 3 November 2021 by Inspector Jones M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing two storey rear back addition and two storey rear detached structure, construction of four storey rear extension to existing main building including change of use of premises to hotel use. The proposal would provide 22 bedrooms with en suites, including two wheelchair accessible rooms, reception area and breakfast/coffee lounge at ground floor level with main entrance off Ilford Lane

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Jones M
Postcode
IG1 2LG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The unacceptable effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, which would conflict with the development plan and could not be outweighed by the benefits of hotel provision.

The harm to character and appearance brings the scheme into conflict with the development plan when read as a whole, and there are no other considerations, including the Framework and the benefits of hotel provision, which outweigh this conflict.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP26 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030Policy D3 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

539 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed26 June 20233312474
    22-24, Coventry Road, Ilford, Essex, IG1 4QR
  2. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  3. Allowed25 September 20266013032
    289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
  4. Dismissed25 September 20263361999
    2A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
  5. Allowed25 September 20263360229
    38, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.