Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20213273819

Alpine Works Hallowell Close, MITCHAM, CR4 2QD

Single storey extension to the front and change of use from B8 storage and distribution to C3 residential to create 2 No one bedroom self- contained flats

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed new dwelling would provide for a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, external amenity space and outlook
  • Character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would fail to provide an adequate standard of accommodation for future occupiers due to unacceptable lack of privacy and inadequate external amenity space, and would harm the character and appearance of the area.

The benefits of bringing a vacant building back into use and contributing to housing needs and economic benefits were outweighed by the harm to the standard of accommodation for future occupiers and the harm to character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS9, Policy CS14, Policy DM D2, Policy DM D3, Policy D3, Policy D6, Policy CS13

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982) JLP 37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.