Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld27 August 20213273821

Glebe Cottage and Land at Glebe Cottage, Waltham Road, White Waltham, SL6 3JD

Without planning permission, the erection of a boundary treatment (consisting of a timber close-slatted design fence, brick wall and associated pillars/gates) adjacent to a highway (as identified on the attached site plan in green)

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hand S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the brick pillars, walls and gates constitute permitted development under Part 2, Class A of Schedule 2 of the General Permitted Development (England) Order 2015
  • Whether the enforcement notice should be varied to require reduction of the timber fence to 1m height rather than complete removal

What decided it

The brick pillars, walls and gates were not adjacent to the highway due to their setback position and angled orientation, and therefore constituted permitted development, while the timber fence remained subject to enforcement but could be reduced to 1m height rather than removed entirely.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.