Planning appeal decision
Mill Farm, Sonning Eye, RG4 6TR
described as ‘New building works and alterations to the existing carried out under permitted development
- Authority
- South Oxfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Jones R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse to issue a certificate of lawful development was well-founded, turning on whether the new building works and alterations would have been lawful on 21 October 2020 as permitted development under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
What decided it
The extension to Unit 2 satisfied the permitted development limitations under Class H of the GPDO 2015, particularly the 5-metre boundary setback requirement in H.1(e), whereas the extension to Unit 3 breached this limitation by being positioned alongside the boundary to Mill Farm Cottages.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®