Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 October 20213274025

27 Clarendon Gardens, Wembley, HA9 7QW

Planning appeal 3274025 at 27 Clarendon Gardens, Wembley, HA9 7QW (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 12 October 2021 by Inspector Bowyer J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

retrospective application for outbuilding constructed in the garden being used as a glass-making workshop

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Bowyer J
Postcode
HA9 7QW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings with particular regard to noise and odour, and whether or not it would be overbearing to the occupiers of 29 Clarendon Gardens

What decided it

The outbuilding's position immediately behind an existing structure, combined with the disproportionate combined bulk of outbuildings and the uncertain noise and odour impacts of the proposed workshop use, caused unacceptable harm to both character and neighbouring living conditions.

No balancing exercise was undertaken; the proposal was found to conflict with the development plan with no material considerations indicating a decision contrary to the plan should be reached.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1 of the Development Management Policies 2016
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

617 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR
  3. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972
    The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
  4. Notice upheld12 August 20263344966
    46 Aylestone Avenue, London, NW6 7AA
  5. Split Decision10 August 20263349809
    10 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.