Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 October 20213274025

27 Clarendon Gardens, WEMBLEY, HA9 7QW

retrospective application for outbuilding constructed in the garden being used as a glass-making workshop

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Bowyer J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings with particular regard to noise and odour, and whether or not it would be overbearing to the occupiers of 29 Clarendon Gardens

What decided it

The outbuilding's position immediately behind an existing structure, combined with the disproportionate combined bulk of outbuildings and the uncertain noise and odour impacts of the proposed workshop use, caused unacceptable harm to both character and neighbouring living conditions.

No balancing exercise was undertaken; the proposal was found to conflict with the development plan with no material considerations indicating a decision contrary to the plan should be reached.

Plan policies cited: Policy DMP1 of the Development Management Policies 2016

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.