Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 October 20213274026

2 Claremont Villas, Coleshill Road, Furnace End, Coleshill, B46 2LG

Planning appeal 3274026 at 2 Claremont Villas, Coleshill Road, Furnace End, Coleshill, B46 2LG (North Warwickshire Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 October 2021 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Provision of internal access drive and the construction of two bungalows and one two storey house

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edginton A
Postcode
B46 2LG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of future occupiers and occupiers of Claremont Villas with particular regard to amenity space, outlook, overlooking and light
  • Whether the development would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed Bubble Inn, the Grade II listed Cottage, adjoining Mill garage, and Mill garage, Coleshill Road, and the scheduled monument of Furnace End Bridge
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The harm arising from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with harm to character and appearance and living conditions, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of providing accessible housing, and very special circumstances did not exist to justify the proposal.

The benefits to accessibility and social benefits of allowing local residents to downsize within the village did not clearly outweigh the harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, harm to character and appearance, and harm to living conditions of existing and future occupiers; the balance tipped against the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP3LP2NW2NW3NW5NW6LP9LP30ENV12ENV13NW12LP29NW10NW14LP15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 16Paragraph 66Paragraph 130Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 219

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Warwickshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed3 August 20266010427
    Land Opposite Quarry House, Nuneaton Road, Furnace End, Coleshill, B46 2NG
  2. Dismissed30 July 20266009798
    Land 120m North East of Ridley House, Ridley Lane, Nether Whitacre, B46 2DH
  3. Allowed22 June 20266004388
    Land Between 10 And 32, Birmingham Road, Whitacre Heath, B46 2EN
  4. Allowed29 January 20266001004
    Cliff Meadows, Tamworth Road, Kingsbury, B78 2DS
  5. Allowed11 December 20253349391
    Land 800 Metres South Of Park House Farm, Meriden Road, Fillongley, Warwickshire, CV7 8BP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.