Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 November 20213274073

32 Church Lane, Leytonstone, London, E11 1HG

Planning appeal 3274073 at 32 Church Lane, Leytonstone, London, E11 1HG (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 26 November 2021 by Inspector Smith A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect upon the living conditions of residential occupiers at No 31a Church Lane and 32a, having particular regard to outlook and light.

described on the application form as: ‘Continued use as restaurant and shisha bar and alterations to form new compliant ventilation to roof area over shisha bar. Application for formal change of use as part shisha bar at rear of building

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Smith A
Postcode
E11 1HG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect upon the living conditions of residential occupiers at No 31a Church Lane and 32a, having particular regard to outlook and light
  • The effect upon the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers, having particular regard to the potential for noise and odours to be generated

What decided it

The proposal would cause harm to the living conditions of residential occupiers through loss of outlook and undemonstrated risks of noise and odour generation, conflicting with development plan policies and with no material considerations to overcome this conflict.

The limited economic benefits of supporting a single business did not outweigh the identified harms to living conditions and associated policy conflicts.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS13Policy CS15Policy DM32

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

570 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY
  2. Dismissed30 July 20266008789
    200 202 Billet Road, Walthamstow, E17 5DX
  3. Notice varied and upheld27 April 20263345263
    66 Huxley Road, London, E10 5QU
  4. Notice varied and upheld20 April 20263347896
    79 Rosebank Road (Unit 79), London, E17 8NH
  5. Dismissed25 February 20263360432
    389 High Road Leyton, London, E10 5NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.