Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 May 20223274149

Land to the North of Bletchingley Road, Merstham, Redhill, Surrey RH1 3EH, RH1 3EH

Planning appeal 3274149 at Land to the North of Bletchingley Road, Merstham, Redhill, Surrey RH1 3EH, RH1 3EH (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 May 2022 by Inspector Parsons J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

the erection of a single dwelling and the formation of a new access

Authority
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Parsons J
Postcode
RH1 3EH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effects of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 1 Brook Road, having regard to privacy

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area from an overdeveloped and incongruous form of development outweighed the modest benefits of the scheme, including the limited contribution to housing supply.

the significant harm to character and appearance, together with conflict with the development plan as a whole, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits (including little weight given to housing supply) under the tilted balance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DES1Policy DES2Policy TAP1Policy CS1Policy CS10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 60Paragraph 119Paragraph 120Paragraph 126Paragraph 127Paragraph 129Paragraph 130Paragraph 210

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

52 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266014528
    13 Weald Way, Reigate, RH2 7RG
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266008015
    Boreham House, Alocks Lane, Kingswood, KT206BB
  3. Allowed5 October 20266007999
    Land Adjacent to 'Clouds', Rockshaw Road, Merstham, RH1 3BZ
  4. Invalid5 October 20266007401
    50 Nutfield Road, Merstham, RH1 3EP
  5. Allowed28 September 20266007410
    50 Nutfield Road, Merstham, RH1 3EP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.