Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision24 September 20213274170

27 Church Hill, Ironbridge, TELFORD, TF8 7PZ

retrospective permission for erection of traditional, rustic, folly style summerhouse with raised deck area and composting outdoor loo; for incidental enjoyment of application as garden building. Appeal B: APP/C3240/C/21/3274170 27 Church Hill, Ironbridge, Telford TF8 7PZ

Authority
Telford and Wrekin Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hanson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Severn Gorge Conservation Area, the Outstanding Universal Value of the Ironbridge Gorge World Heritage Site, and the setting of Listed Buildings and Buildings of Local Interest
  • The living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties
  • The structural stability of the sloping land

What decided it

The summerhouse's scale, siting and appearance presented a prominent anomaly in the verdant landscape setting of the Gorge, causing less than substantial harm to heritage assets with no public benefits to outweigh it, whereas the composting toilet's limited visual impact would preserve the landscape setting and character.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets was weighed against the public benefits of the proposal; as the site was already in its optimum use as a private garden with no public benefits, the harm was not outweighed, but the composting toilet alone was acceptable as it caused no such harm.

Framework references: 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy BE2, Policy BE3, Policy BE4, Policy BE5, Policy BE6, Policy BE9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.