Planning appeal decision
Plots 110 - 114, Forge Manor, Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire , SK23 6BW
Planning appeal 3274517 at Plots 110 - 114, Forge Manor, Forge Road, Chinley, Derbyshire , SK23 6BW (High Peak Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 October 2021 by Inspector Wraight G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
a Detailed Planning Application For Revisions To Layout Approved Under Reserved Matters Approval HPK/2016/0313 (Phase 2) Comprising Alternative Road Layout, The Repositioning Of A Bridge Crossing Black Brook And Revised Dwelling Types For Plots 110 – 114
- Authority
- High Peak Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Wraight G
- Postcode
- SK23 6BW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The proposed dwellings would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area through their greater height, footprint, massing and less sensitive design compared to the approved fallback scheme, which outweighs any benefits advanced.
The significant harm to character and appearance and conflict with the development plan outweighed the limited weight attributable to the fallback position and the neutral or limited weight of the benefits advanced, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S1aPolicy S2Policy EQ6Policy EQ9Policy EQ7Policy H1Policy H3Policy EQ2Policy S6High Peak Design Guide 2018Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document 2005Landscape Character Supplementary Planning Document 2006
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in High Peak
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed5 October 20266013259Shady Oak Inn, Long Hill, Fernilee, SK23 7HD
- Allowed30 September 20266009410Land Rear Of 53 Beresford Avenue., Chapel-en-le-Frith, SK23 0PZ
- Dismissed21 September 20266011421Land Adjacent To Salisbury Cottages, Unnamed Road From Salisbury Street To Salisbury Cottages, Hadfield, Glossop, SK13 1NN
- Allowed21 September 2026601031115 Compton Road, Buxton, SK17 9DN
- Dismissed4 September 20266011027The Rising Rest Home, Primrose Lane, Simmondley, Glossop, SK13 6LW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®