Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 October 20213274534

Former Egglescliffe Library, Butterfield Drive, BuEaglescliffetterfield Drive, Stockton on Tees, TS16 0EL

Planning appeal 3274534 at Former Egglescliffe Library, Butterfield Drive, BuEaglescliffetterfield Drive, Stockton on Tees, TS16 0EL (Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council) was dismissed on 1 October 2021 by Inspector Brooker M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the construction of 2no. retail units (A1)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Brooker M
Postcode
TS16 0EL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether it has been demonstrated that there are no sequentially preferable sites on which the retail proposal could be accommodated, with regards the sequential test set out in the National Planning Policy Framework and the Planning Practice Guidance

What decided it

The significant loss of open space and failure to satisfy the sequential test for retail development, neither of which was outweighed by the economic benefits or mitigation measures proposed.

The benefits of additional investment and job creation were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance through loss of open space and the failure to demonstrate compliance with the sequential test for retail uses.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD5Policy SD8Policy ENV6Policy SD4Policy EG3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 86Paragraph 87Paragraph 91

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

32 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed21 October 20266013736
    74a Darlington Road, Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 5ET
  2. Allowed6 August 20266005240
    84 Wolsingham Drive, Thornaby, TS17 9EQ
  3. Allowed5 August 20266007311
    Little Meadows, Elton, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 1AG
  4. Allowed15 June 20266004414
    76 High Street, Yarm, TS15 9AH
  5. Dismissed1 June 20266004726
    Footpath Outside 45 Oxbridge Lane, Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 4AP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.