Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 September 20213274552

2 Pine Road, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, SO53 1LP

Planning appeal 3274552 at 2 Pine Road, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, SO53 1LP (Eastleigh Borough Council) was dismissed on 28 September 2021 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the existing occupiers of No 67a Hiltingbury Road, with regard to outlook and daylight and sunlight.

side, rear and first floor extensions

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Buchanan R
Postcode
SO53 1LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the existing occupiers of No 67a Hiltingbury Road, with regard to outlook and daylight and sunlight

What decided it

The proposed side elevation would cause substantial harm to the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers through unacceptable overbearing impact and restriction of daylight and sunlight to the rear garden and dining room, contrary to development plan policies requiring appropriate siting, design, mass and scale.

The limited benefits of construction activity, increased dwelling supply and improvements to the appeal site dwelling were outweighed by the substantial harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with respect to outlook, daylight and sunlight.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Saved Policy 59.BE of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan Review May 2006Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

58 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Eastleigh

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed28 October 20266015767
    4 Barfoot Road, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 2LL
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266005642
    Land at Denham's Corner, Horton Heath, Eastleigh, SO32 2BW
  3. Dismissed12 October 20266011328
    27 Moore Crescent, Netley, Southampton, So315by
  4. Dismissed8 October 20266008044
    Quob Store Bungalow, Allington Lane, West End, SO30 3HQ
  5. Dismissed31 July 20266007661
    1 Oakmount Avenue, Chandlers Ford, Southampton, SO533AB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.