Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 July 20223274582

16 Cambridge Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3JY

Planning appeal 3274582 at 16 Cambridge Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3JY (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 12 July 2022 by Inspector Jones RE, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal represents an acceptable form of development having regard to its flood zone location and the provisions of the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework and associated guidance.

demolition of disused building and erection of a single- storey (1b1p) dwelling house

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones RE
Postcode
KT1 3JY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal represents an acceptable form of development having regard to its flood zone location and the provisions of the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework and associated guidance

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide sufficient detailed analysis and evidence to demonstrate that the Sequential Test had been satisfied, such that the location in Flood Risk Zone 2 could not be justified.

The economic benefits of construction and future resident spending, together with the addition of one dwelling to housing supply, do not outweigh the identified harm or indicate a decision other than in accordance with the development plan

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM4 of the Council's Core Strategy (2012)Policy SI12 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 162Paragraph 163

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

362 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266009988
    56 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
  3. Dismissed25 September 20266009076
    74 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
  4. Allowed11 August 20266010924
    271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
  5. Dismissed3 August 20266007703
    Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.