Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld23 May 20223274606

68 Hay Lane, Kingsbury, London, NW9 0NB

without planning permission, the erection of a single-storey rear extension and outbuilding to the rear of the property AND Without planning permission, the excavation to the front of the property and the building of retaining walls to create a front drive way/parking area, and the formation of an access onto a highway

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Savage M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the appeal scheme on the character or appearance of the Buck Lane Conservation Area (BLCA)
  • The effect of the outbuilding on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, having regard to outlook
  • The effect of the rear extension on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, having regard to outlook

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the Buck Lane Conservation Area caused by the incongruous materials and design of the unauthorised works, combined with harm to neighbouring living conditions, outweighed any benefits of the scheme.

Framework references: 189, 199, 202

Plan policies cited: DMP1, BHC1, BD1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.