®Planning appeal decision
Second Floor, 41 Scrubs Lane, LONDON, NW10 6AA
the erection of a rear roof extension including the formation of a hip to gable roof extension; installation of 2no rooflights in the front roofslope
- Authority
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Wyborn D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting to St Mary's Conservation Area
What decided it
The limited public benefits of the scheme, being largely private benefit to occupants, did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area's setting and the harm to the character and appearance of the area, to which great weight must be given.
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area's setting and character and appearance of the area was weighed against the limited public benefits of improved accommodation, and the harm was not outweighed.
Framework references: 202
Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.