Planning appeal decision
Hurdles Way, Thriplow, Duxford, CB22 4PA
Planning appeal 3274946 at Hurdles Way, Thriplow, Duxford, CB22 4PA (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 30 September 2021 by Inspector Dyer S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision to refuse the application for a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded.
erection of air conditioning units and intake/ extraction flues on existing building
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Dyer S
- Postcode
- CB22 4PA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse the application for a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded
What decided it
The development materially affects the external appearance of the premises through the visibility and visual impact of the AC units and flues, and therefore does not constitute permitted development under Class I of the GDPO.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Cambridgeshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed23 October 20266005101Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266010417Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
- Dismissed19 October 2026600863119 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
- Dismissed16 October 20266011793Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
- Allowed16 October 20266010543Bridgefoot Farm, Barley Road, Flint Cross, Great and Little Chishill, SG8 7PU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®