Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 December 20213275021

Lord Line Building, St Andrews Dock, Clive Sullivan Way , Hull, HU3 4PB

described on the application form as “the erection of building to provide self-contained flats with undercroft parking following demolition of Lord Line Building (Outline application - details of access, appearance, layout and scale submitted) – Resubmission

Authority
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wilkinson F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with regard to noise
  • whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for new housing having regard to accessibility to local services and facilities
  • the effects of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area with specific regard to its design, the St Andrew's Dock Conservation Area and a locally listed building
  • whether the proposed development would result in the unacceptable loss of employment land
  • whether the proposed development would make acceptable provision for open space and trees

What decided it

The cumulative conflict with the development plan arising from unacceptable living conditions due to noise, unsuitability of location due to poor accessibility, and unjustified harm to the conservation area and locally listed building outweighed any material considerations.

The benefits of housing delivery and removal of a derelict building did not outweigh the less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area and locally listed building, given the weight to be attached to heritage conservation and the failure to demonstrate that demolition was necessary.

Framework references: 11, 182, 199, 202, 203

Plan policies cited: Policy 1(4), Policy 1(5), Policy 2, Policy 4(5a), Policy 4(5b), Policy 14(a ii), Policy 14(a iii), Policy 14(a iv), Policy 14(b), Policy 16, Policy 26(a), Policy 42, Policy 45

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.