Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20213275036

Highcroft Cottage, Park Head, MATLOCK, DE4 5GY

outline application for the erection of two dwellings on land adjacent to the existing entrance

Authority
Amber Valley Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Russell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would be sustainably located
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including landscape character
  • whether the proposal would give rise to highway safety issues

What decided it

The proposal would not be sustainably located and would cause moderate harm to character and appearance, which adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of two dwellings in an area with a demonstrable five-year housing supply.

the adverse impacts of unsustainable location and moderate harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of two additional dwellings and modest economic benefits, particularly given the Council's demonstrated five-year housing supply and exceeded housing delivery targets

Framework references: 80, 11, 105, 130, 174

Plan policies cited: Policy EN1, Policy H5, Policy LS1, Policy EN7, Policy TP1, Policy NP1, Policy NP2, Policy NP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.