Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 February 20223275247

148 Wood End Lane, Northolt, UB5 4JR

Planning appeal 3275247 at 148 Wood End Lane, Northolt, UB5 4JR (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 15 February 2022 by Inspector Wilson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be ancillary to the residential use of the building.

to complete the construction of a basement which has been partially begun below part of the existing residential development. The proposed basement to be used as a gymnasium

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wilson L
Postcode
UB5 4JR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be ancillary to the residential use of the building
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the host building and neighbouring properties, having regard to noise, vibration and disturbance
  • The effect of the development on the character of the host building and surrounding area

What decided it

The unacceptable effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of the host building, particularly flat 2, from noise, vibration and disturbance associated with the proposed gymnasium use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D10 (London Plan 2021)Policy GG2 (London Plan 2021)Policy D1 (London Plan 2021)Policy D3 (London Plan 2021)Policy D8 (London Plan 2021)Policy D14 (London Plan 2021)Policy S5 (London Plan 2021)Policy 7A (Development Management DPD 2013)Policy 7B (Development Management DPD 2013)Policy 7.4 (Development Management DPD 2013)SPD4 (Residential Extensions)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

267 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  2. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  3. Dismissed28 July 20263375731
    153-155 Uxbridge Road, London, W7 3SP
  4. Notice upheld24 July 20263351648
    55 Evelyn Grove, Southall, UB1 2BP
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266007913
    Unit 2, The Three Horseshoes, South Road, Southall, UB1 1SU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.