Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 January 20223275279

24 and 26 Brooklands Gardens, Hornchurch, RM11 2AE

Planning appeal 3275279 at 24 and 26 Brooklands Gardens, Hornchurch, RM11 2AE (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 24 January 2022 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

extension of 24 and 26 Brooklands Gardens plus installation of a single dwelling on land belonging to and located between 24 and 26 Brooklands Gardens, Hornchurch RM11 2AE

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Savage K
Postcode
RM11 2AE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, with respect to outlook, light, overbearing and sense of enclosure
  • The effect of the proposal on an existing street tree

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance and neighbours' living conditions, when weighed against the limited housing benefit of a single dwelling, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits under the tilted balance test.

The limited benefits from one additional dwelling and associated economic activity were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and neighbours' living conditions, such that the proposal did not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 26Policy 7Policy 27Policy 2 of the Council's Tree Strategy 2009-2019
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

475 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.