Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 October 20223275299

11 Alexandra Road, Warlingham, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9DW

Planning appeal 3275299 at 11 Alexandra Road, Warlingham, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9DW (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 28 October 2022 by Inspector Douglas L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, with particular regard to whether the proposal would comprise 'development' as defined at section 55 of the Act, and if it would, whether the proposal would constitute 'permitted development' by virtue of the provisions of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO.

described on the application form as: ‘To create a roof terrace on an existing flat roof (new roof has been installed and is approx. 12ft x 9ft), with composite decking on the floor, to be fitted with frosted glass balustrades to a height of 1100mm to comply with building regulations. No machinery to be installed and the proposed use is for occasional use in the summer months for myself

Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Douglas L
Postcode
CR6 9DW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, with particular regard to whether the proposal would comprise 'development' as defined at section 55 of the Act, and if it would, whether the proposal would constitute 'permitted development' by virtue of the provisions of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO

What decided it

The proposed balustrades would constitute development requiring planning permission and would not qualify as permitted development under the GPDO, and no planning permission exists for the proposed development.

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

94 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014139
    31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266005184
    Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
  4. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.