Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 December 20213275305

1 Chesham Road , Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3AG

Erection of first floor rear and side extension, in order to facilitate the conversion of the existing storage room into a two-bedroom self-contained flat. A piggy back roof extension similar to already approved schemes at neighbouring properties is also proposed

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Langford-Tejrar K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers of the development
  • Whether the proposal would have an unacceptable impact on highway safety, or the residual cumulative impacts on the road network would be severe

What decided it

The proposal would create a dominant and incongruous addition that overwhelms the modest appearance of the host dwelling and is out of keeping with the character of Chesham Road, and would fail to provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers.

The limited benefit of contributing an additional residential unit to local housing need was outweighed by the substantial harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area, and the failure to provide adequate living conditions.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy CS8, Policy DM10

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.