Planning appeal decision
1 Halliwick Road, LONDON, N10 1AA
described as a garden room in the rear garden
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Fleming D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded
What decided it
The garden room as a whole could not be considered incidental to the enjoyment of the dwelling because the family room component constituted primary living accommodation (a lounge) which could reasonably be accommodated within the main house, and the building must be entirely incidental to qualify as permitted development.
Judgments cited: Emin v SSE & Mid Sussex DC [1989] EGCS 16
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®