Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 January 20223275483

69 Highlands Road, Leatherhead, KT22 8NW

Planning appeal 3275483 at 69 Highlands Road, Leatherhead, KT22 8NW (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 20 January 2022 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the erection of 5 No. dwellings with associated parking, one quadruple garage and one single detached garage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S
Postcode
KT22 8NW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of neighbours and future occupants of the development

What decided it

The substantial and long-lasting harms to the character and appearance of the area and to neighbours' living conditions outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery in circumstances where the development failed to respect the prevailing pattern and qualities of the area.

The moderate weight given to the provision of five additional homes and economic benefits during construction was outweighed by substantial weight attributed to the long-lasting harms to character and appearance and neighbours' living conditions, which were in direct compliance with the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS14 of the Core StrategyPolicy ENV22 of the Local PlanPolicy ENV23 of the Local PlanPolicy ENV24 of the Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

123 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010634
    The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266003694
    1 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266010203
    High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.