Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 September 20213275486

Chapel Bungalow Site, Totters Lane, Potbridge, Odiham, Hook, RG29 1JW

Planning appeal 3275486 at Chapel Bungalow Site, Totters Lane, Potbridge, Odiham, Hook, RG29 1JW (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 29 September 2021 by Inspector Davies G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site would be a suitable location for development having regard to local spatial strategy and accessibility.

the removal of existing dwellings, shed, caravan, lean -to extension and re-development of the site for 5 self or custom build dwellings and all ancillary development

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Davies G
Postcode
RG29 1JW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site would be a suitable location for development having regard to local spatial strategy and accessibility
  • the effect on the landscape
  • development on common land
  • the effect on highway safety
  • the effect on the setting of the grade II listed dwelling at Valley End, Potbridge Road

What decided it

The harm caused to landscape character and the development on registered common land outweighed the benefits of additional housing and site remediation.

The conflict with the development plan, in particular the harm caused to the landscape character of the area and development on common land, outweighed the more limited benefits of additional housing, improved housing standards, site tidying, and self-build provision.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy NBE1Policy NBE2Policy NBE8Policy INF3Policy GEN1Policy CON23

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

20 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed8 October 20266011669
    Cedars House, Thackhams Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8JG
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266005123
    Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0NJ
  3. Allowed7 September 20266011109
    16 Cricket Green, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PP
  4. Dismissed3 September 20266004528
    Malthouse Mews, Brew House Lane, Hartley Wintney, RG27 8QA
  5. Allowed1 September 20266011801
    Esso Petrol Station, Hook Road, North Warnborough, RG29 1EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.