Planning appeal decision
High Street, Harborne, Birmingham, B17 9NS
Planning appeal 3275790 at High Street, Harborne, Birmingham, B17 9NS (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 9 November 2021 by Inspector Johnson W, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area, including the setting of a designated heritage asset.
an 18-metre phase 8 monopole C/W wraparound cabinet at base and associated ancillary works
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Johnson W
- Postcode
- B17 9NS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area, including the setting of a designated heritage asset
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area, combined with less than substantial harm to the setting of the designated heritage asset, was not outweighed by the public benefits of enhanced telecommunications infrastructure.
The public benefits of the installation in terms of enhancement of the telecommunications network, contribution to economic growth and operational needs of the operators do not outweigh the significant harm identified to character and appearance and the less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005 paragraph 8.55Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005 paragraph 8.55 A to CPolicy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017Telecommunications Development: Mobile Phone Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document 2008
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 114Paragraph 117Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed23 March 20263376018Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham, B13 8HW
- Dismissed23 March 20263375839Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham
- Dismissed23 March 20263375725Footpath Outside 86C Old Snow Hill, Birmingham, B4 6HW
- Dismissed28 August 20253365270Stratford Road, Hall Green, Birmingham, B28 9EF
- Allowed22 August 20253366060Jamia Masjid Haroonia, 766 Alum Rock Road, Birmingham, B8 3PX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®