Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 November 20213275790

High Street, Harborne, Birmingham, B17 9NS

an 18-metre phase 8 monopole C/W wraparound cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Johnson W

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area, including the setting of a designated heritage asset

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area, combined with less than substantial harm to the setting of the designated heritage asset, was not outweighed by the public benefits of enhanced telecommunications infrastructure.

The public benefits of the installation in terms of enhancement of the telecommunications network, contribution to economic growth and operational needs of the operators do not outweigh the significant harm identified to character and appearance and the less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset.

Framework references: 8, 11, 114, 117, 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005 paragraph 8.55, Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005 paragraph 8.55 A to C, Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017, Telecommunications Development: Mobile Phone Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document 2008

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.