Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20213275816

47 Harpsden Road, Henley-on-Thames, RG9 1EE

Planning appeal 3275816 at 47 Harpsden Road, Henley-on-Thames, RG9 1EE (South Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 7 December 2021 by Inspector Tudhope S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building.

Addition on one flat roof dormer to a loft which has been converted. The current head height means this is not a practical space. It complies with fire regulations and therefore can be classified as a bedroom but it is not a practical space. Neither as a bedroom nor as a work space

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Tudhope S
Postcode
RG9 1EE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building
  • whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Reading Road Conservation Area

What decided it

The absence of substantive public benefits to weigh against the less than substantial harm to the heritage asset meant the proposal could not be justified despite the private benefits to the appellant.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area was not outweighed by any substantive public benefits, as only private benefits to the appellant were demonstrated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DES1Policy DES2Policy H20Policy ENV6Policy ENV8Policy DSQ1Policy EN5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

63 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Oxfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013107
    Charleston, Bolney Road, Lower Shiplake, RG9 3NS
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266005561
    4 Spring Path, Thame, OX9 2EF
  3. Allowed26 October 20266011152
    Luffield House, 85A Wallingford Road, Goring, RG8 0HL
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266007830
    Land off Wyfold Lane, Peppard Common, RG9 5LR
  5. Allowed7 October 20266005521
    Land Rear of The Paddocks, Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, OX39 4GR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.