Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20213275865

Landram, 53 Haroldslea Drive, HORLEY, RH6 9DT

part single storey/part double storey rear extension, double storey side extensions (east and west side), roof extension to incorporate habitable space with 2no. feature glazed dormers and front porch

Authority
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Miles H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the proposed roof and trees
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to any overbearing impact to 55 Haroldslea Drive
  • Whether the proposed development would reduce the impact of flooding

What decided it

The harmful effect on character and appearance caused by the awkward and oversized roof form, combined with the unacceptable overbearing impact on neighbouring living conditions, outweighed the limited benefits of the development.

The public and permanent environmental harm to character and appearance and living conditions of neighbours, contrary to the development plan, outweighed the limited social and economic benefits of the extended family dwelling.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS4 of the Reigate and Banstead Local Plan: Core Strategy July 2014, Policy DES1 of the Reigate and Banstead Local Plan Development Management Plan September 2019, Policy NHE3 of the Reigate and Banstead Local Plan Development Management Plan September 2019, Policy CCF2 of the Reigate and Banstead Local Plan Development Management Plan September 2019

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.