Planning appeal decision
Brockmer, Kerdiston Road, Reepham, NR10 4RY
Planning appeal 3275889 at Brockmer, Kerdiston Road, Reepham, NR10 4RY (Broadland District Council) was dismissed on 17 February 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with particular regard to access to services and facilities.
described on the application form as ‘outline application with all matters reserved other than access for the erection 1 no. dwelling including repositioning of access
- Authority
- Broadland District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Simpson L
- Postcode
- NR10 4RY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with particular regard to access to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
What decided it
The poor access to services and facilities requiring overreliance on motor vehicles, combined with the harmful impact on rural character from the dwelling and tree removal, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of a single dwelling even under the tilted balance.
The adverse impacts of granting permission—poor access to services and facilities and harmful impact on character and appearance—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of one dwelling and minor economic/social benefits, even when assessed under the tilted balance triggered by the alleged housing land supply shortfall.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Development Management DPD Policy GC2JCS Policy 1Development Management DPD Policy GC4JCS Policy 2Development Management DPD Policy TS3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 80Paragraph 105Paragraph 111Paragraph 130Paragraph 219
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Broadland
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed19 October 20266008376Plough Meadow, Land South Of Hall Road, Alderford, Norwich, NR9 5NQ
- Allowed14 October 20266007160Land North of Aylsham Road, East of Holt Road (British National Grid Coordinates 615529 (Easting) 325042 (Northing).), Cawston, NR10 4HR
- Allowed23 September 2026601128337 Town Lane, Aylsham, NR11 6HH
- Dismissed4 August 20266008950Land at 52 Gordon Avenue, Norwich, NR7 0DP
- Dismissed9 July 20266004893Land Adjoining Tunstall Road, Halvergate, NR13 3PN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®