Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 February 20223275889

Brockmer, Kerdiston Road, Reepham, NR10 4RY

Planning appeal 3275889 at Brockmer, Kerdiston Road, Reepham, NR10 4RY (Broadland District Council) was dismissed on 17 February 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with particular regard to access to services and facilities.

described on the application form as ‘outline application with all matters reserved other than access for the erection 1 no. dwelling including repositioning of access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Simpson L
Postcode
NR10 4RY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with particular regard to access to services and facilities
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The poor access to services and facilities requiring overreliance on motor vehicles, combined with the harmful impact on rural character from the dwelling and tree removal, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of a single dwelling even under the tilted balance.

The adverse impacts of granting permission—poor access to services and facilities and harmful impact on character and appearance—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of one dwelling and minor economic/social benefits, even when assessed under the tilted balance triggered by the alleged housing land supply shortfall.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Development Management DPD Policy GC2JCS Policy 1Development Management DPD Policy GC4JCS Policy 2Development Management DPD Policy TS3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 80Paragraph 105Paragraph 111Paragraph 130Paragraph 219

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broadland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed19 October 20266008376
    Plough Meadow, Land South Of Hall Road, Alderford, Norwich, NR9 5NQ
  2. Allowed14 October 20266007160
    Land North of Aylsham Road, East of Holt Road (British National Grid Coordinates 615529 (Easting) 325042 (Northing).), Cawston, NR10 4HR
  3. Allowed23 September 20266011283
    37 Town Lane, Aylsham, NR11 6HH
  4. Dismissed4 August 20266008950
    Land at 52 Gordon Avenue, Norwich, NR7 0DP
  5. Dismissed9 July 20266004893
    Land Adjoining Tunstall Road, Halvergate, NR13 3PN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.