Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 May 20223275891

The Surrey Yeoman, 220-222 High Street, Dorking, RH4 1QR

Planning appeal 3275891 at The Surrey Yeoman, 220-222 High Street, Dorking, RH4 1QR (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 27 May 2022 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on heritage assets.

erection of a new single detached dwelling on the land to the rear of the Grade II Listed Surrey Yeoman public house

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pipkin R
Postcode
RH4 1QR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on heritage assets
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to noise and general disturbance
  • the effect of the proposed development on the economic viability of the public house

What decided it

The significant though less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed building and conservation area, combined with the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions and harm to the public house's viability, outweighed the limited public benefits of the scheme.

The public benefits of providing a new dwelling in a sustainable town centre location and tidying up the unmade road were limited and did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to heritage assets and the harm to the economic and social benefits of the public house operations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS14Policy CS17Policy ENV22Policy ENV23Policy ENV24Policy ENV39Policy ENV43
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

80 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed29 May 20266004426
    Land to the East of Home Farm, Dukes Road, Dorking,, Surrey, RH5 5BY
  2. Allowed30 April 20266003604
    The White Hart Public House, 5 Dene Street, Dorking, RH4 2DR
  3. Allowed6 March 20263375794
    Unit 3 Crouch Industrial Estate, Barnett Wood Lane, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT22 7DG
  4. Dismissed19 December 20253372211
    St. Michaels House Dell Close, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EE
  5. Allowed29 September 20253363380
    Land at Shellwood Road, Leigh, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 8NX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.