Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted20 February 20233276123

The Beeches, Swan Road, IVER, SL0 9LA

Without planning permission: the material change of use of the Land to a mixed (sui generis) use comprising residential and a caravan park for residential purposes by the stationing [of] caravans (“the Unauthorised Use”)

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Renaudon L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Ground (b): whether the description of the use as alleged in the notice is correct
  • Ground (c): whether the use (as found) requires planning permission
  • Ground (d): whether the use has subsisted for a sufficient period of time as to be immune from enforcement action
  • Ground (a)(i): whether the development is inappropriate in the Green Belt, and the effect of the development on the openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • Ground (a)(ii): any other harm and/or policy conflicts arising, particularly the effects of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the area, and in relation to biodiversity
  • Ground (a)(iii): whether any harm to the Green Belt and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances justifying the development
  • Grounds (f) and (g): the reasonableness of the requirements of the notice and the period specified for compliance, to include consideration of a temporary permission (not needed to be determined given the outcome on ground (a))

What decided it

The combination of the unmet need for Traveller pitches, the unlikelihood of suitable alternative sites, and the significant weight attached to the occupants' health/personal circumstances was found clearly to outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm and other harm, amounting to very special circumstances.

Substantial harm from Green Belt inappropriateness and limited additional loss of openness, together with moderate harm to character/appearance and biodiversity, was clearly outweighed by the effective use of previously developed land, compliance with most CP4 criteria, unmet Traveller pitch need/lack of alternatives, and significant weight given to occupants' health needs, amounting to very special circumstances justifying permission.

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 4, Core Policy 9, Policy IV6, Policy IV13, CP4

Judgments cited: Smith

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.