Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20213276235

Land Adj to 1187 Newham Way, London, E6 5JJ

Planning appeal 3276235 at Land Adj to 1187 Newham Way, London, E6 5JJ (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 9 December 2021 by Inspector Baxter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

erection of a building containing a studio dwelling (38 sq.m.) plus garden space, cycle parking and bin provision (revised scheme)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Baxter C
Postcode
E6 5JJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The living conditions of future occupiers of the proposal with regards to internal arrangements, outlook, noise and pollution
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties with regards to outlook, noise and privacy

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area caused by the single storey design and utilitarian styling, which conflicts with the established two and three storey built form of the area, outweighed the benefits of the proposal.

The benefits of housing contribution, biodiversity enhancement, cycle parking, waste management, energy efficiency and accessible design did not outweigh the harm to character and appearance of the surrounding area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S6Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy D1Policy D2Policy D4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

296 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266014267
    Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011081
    239 Barking Road, London, E6 1LB
  3. Allowed16 September 20266011381
    238 Caulfield Road, East Ham, London, E6 2DQ
  4. Notice varied and upheld10 August 20263362536
    32 Kerrison Road, London, E15 2TH
  5. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263358326
    42 Disraeli Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.