Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 December 20213276262

68 Gladstone Avenue, TWICKENHAM, TW2 7PR

erection of an outbuilding on the rear of the house which will be used as a gym and games room with bathroom

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sutton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and whether the character or appearance of Rosecroft Gardens Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory standards with regards to fire safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area, and the limited public benefits of home improvement do not outweigh the great weight that must be given to the conservation of this designated heritage asset.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of Rosecroft Gardens Conservation Area was weighed against the limited public benefits of home improvement, with the balance tipping decisively against the proposal because no public benefits could outweigh the great weight attached to heritage harm.

Framework references: 197, 199

Plan policies cited: Policy LP 1, Policy LP 3, Policy D12 of the London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.