Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 December 20213276262

68 Gladstone Avenue, Twickenham, TW2 7PR

Planning appeal 3276262 at 68 Gladstone Avenue, Twickenham, TW2 7PR (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 December 2021 by Inspector Sutton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and whether the character or appearance of Rosecroft Gardens Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced.

erection of an outbuilding on the rear of the house which will be used as a gym and games room with bathroom

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sutton A
Postcode
TW2 7PR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and whether the character or appearance of Rosecroft Gardens Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory standards with regards to fire safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area, and the limited public benefits of home improvement do not outweigh the great weight that must be given to the conservation of this designated heritage asset.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of Rosecroft Gardens Conservation Area was weighed against the limited public benefits of home improvement, with the balance tipping decisively against the proposal because no public benefits could outweigh the great weight attached to heritage harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP 1Policy LP 3Policy D12 of the London Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 197Paragraph 199

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

517 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.