Planning appeal decision
Land South of Thomas Johnson Lower School and Adjacent to Hurst Grove, Lidlington, Beds, MK43 0SB
Planning appeal 3276356 at Land South of Thomas Johnson Lower School and Adjacent to Hurst Grove, Lidlington, Beds, MK43 0SB (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed on 18 April 2023 by Inspector Franks Z, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, countryside and site.
without planning permission, unauthorised development consisting of the erection of an outbuilding, and associated creation of gravel standing, foul drainage and close boarded fencing on the Land
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Franks Z
- Postcode
- MK43 0SB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, countryside and site
- the effect of the development on biodiversity
- whether the development provides satisfactory living conditions for future residents
- whether there is a need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches
- the personal circumstances of the site occupiers, including the best interest of any children
- whether the development constitutes intentional unauthorised development, and if so, what weight should attach to that
What decided it
The personal circumstances of the appellant and his family, including the best interests of the children and the lack of any alternative accommodation, were determinative in outweighing the limited harm and development plan conflict.
the limited harm to character and appearance and the conflict with the development plan were outweighed by the personal circumstances of the occupiers, the best interests of the children, and the lack of alternative sites, so permission was granted
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP7Policy H7Policy EE2Policy EE5Policy EE8Policy EE9Policy SP8
- Judgments
- Smith v SSLUCH [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed9 October 2026601067023A High Street North, Dunstable, LU6 1HX
- Notice varied and upheld4 August 2026336326410 Knolls View, Totternhoe, Dunstable, LU6 2BT
- Notice upheld21 July 20263367816109 Clophill Road, Maulden, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 2AD
- Allowed16 June 2026600456225 Rectory Lane,, Houghton Conquest,, MK45 3LD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®