Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld7 September 20223276377

Land to the Rear of 67 Butts Green Road, Hornchurch, London, RM11 2JS

Planning appeal 3276377 at Land to the Rear of 67 Butts Green Road, Hornchurch, London, RM11 2JS (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 7 September 2022 by Inspector Walker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the development contributes to the vitality, viability, character or function of the area.

without planning permission, the material change of use of the land to use for the storage of motor vehicles

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Walker A
Postcode
RM11 2JS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the development contributes to the vitality, viability, character or function of the area
  • The effect of the development on the provision of parking at 67 Butts Green Road, and the result of any such effect upon highway safety and upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers as regards noise and disturbance

What decided it

The loss of on-site parking provision for Wykeham House combined with poor public transport access and existing on-street parking restrictions created unacceptable highway safety impacts, and the noise and disturbance from vehicle valeting and cleaning activities caused significant adverse effects on neighbouring residents' living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 19Policy 24
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 111Paragraph 185

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

406 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  2. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL
  3. Planning permission granted29 July 20263367840
    5A Myrtle Road, Romford, RM3 8XS
  4. Notice upheld25 June 20263358682
    Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
  5. Split Decision23 June 20263377437
    Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.