Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds5 November 20213276461

Land known as 39 Wilton Grove, HEYWOOD, OL10 1AS

Authority
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Householder developments
Inspector
Rogers B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to issue an enforcement notice in 2020 in respect to development which it had investigated in 2019 and decided to take no further action on was unreasonable and thereby caused the appellant to incur unnecessary expense

What decided it

The Council's inconsistent communications, whilst unreasonable, did not cause the appellant to incur unnecessary expense because the appellant could have regularised the position retrospectively in 2019 but chose not to do so.

Judgments cited: Guildford BC v SSCLG and Moffat [2009] EWHC 3531 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.