Planning appeal decision
Quashed On Legal Grounds5 November 20213276461
Land known as 39 Wilton Grove, HEYWOOD, OL10 1AS
- Authority
- Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Rogers B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to issue an enforcement notice in 2020 in respect to development which it had investigated in 2019 and decided to take no further action on was unreasonable and thereby caused the appellant to incur unnecessary expense
What decided it
The Council's inconsistent communications, whilst unreasonable, did not cause the appellant to incur unnecessary expense because the appellant could have regularised the position retrospectively in 2019 but chose not to do so.
Judgments cited: Guildford BC v SSCLG and Moffat [2009] EWHC 3531 (Admin)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®