Planning appeal decision
Land to the North and South of Goldsworth Road, Woking, Surrey, GU21 6JT
Planning appeal 3276474 at Land to the North and South of Goldsworth Road, Woking, Surrey, GU21 6JT (Woking Borough Council) was allowed on 10 January 2022 by Inspector Braithwaite J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
Demolition of the existing buildings and redevelopment of the site for a phased mixed-use scheme, comprising 929 residential units (Class C3), communal residential and operational spaces, commercial uses (Classes A1/A2/A3/A4/B1/D1/D2) at ground floor and homeless shelter (sui generis) within 5 blocks of varying heights of between 9 and 37 storeys (including rooftop amenity) to the north and south sides of the site together with hard and soft landscaping including public realm works, highway alterations to Goldsworth Road, car parking, cycle parking, bin storage, ancillary facilities and plant
- Authority
- Woking Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Braithwaite J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of nearby residents, with regard to daylight and privacy
What decided it
The Inspector concluded that the proposed development, including its tallest buildings, would not cause harm to character and appearance or to neighbours' living conditions and accorded with the up-to-date development plan's encouragement of tall buildings in the town centre.
No planning balance exercise was required because the Inspector found the proposal would not cause any harm; the Inspector noted in passing the considerable benefits (929 homes, affordable housing, S106 contributions of nearly £10 million, WRAC and YRP facilities) that would have been weighed had harm been found.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy CS21Policy CS24Policy CS10Policy CS7Policy CS8Policy CS9Policy CS16Policy DM7Site Allocation UA10Site Allocation UA11Site Allocation UA12Site Allocation UA13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 68
- Judgments
- R v Yeovil B C (1972) 23 P&CR 39; Spackman v Wiltshire C C and SoS for the Environment (1977) 33 P&CR 430
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Woking Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed27 October 2026601366110 Moor Lane, Woking, GU22 9QY
- Dismissed19 October 20266006780East House, Chobham Road, Woking, GU21 2TU
- Allowed19 August 20266010130291, Albert Drive, Woking, GU21 5TU
- Allowed11 August 2026600784434, Norfolk Farm Road, Woking, GU22 8LF
- Allowed7 August 20266007333Woodhatch Cottage, 62 Woodham Road, Horsell, Woking, GU21 4EH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®