Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 October 20213276508

33 Seymour Road, Mitcham Junction, CR4 4JX

Planning appeal 3276508 at 33 Seymour Road, Mitcham Junction, CR4 4JX (London Borough of Sutton) was dismissed on 6 October 2021 by Inspector Andrews M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling; the terrace of which it is part, and its wider surroundings.

the construction of a rear mansard loft extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Andrews M
Postcode
CR4 4JX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling; the terrace of which it is part, and its wider surroundings

What decided it

The mansard roof would be alien to the Victorian character of the host dwelling and terrace and, because of its prominent corner position, would cause unacceptable harm to character and appearance in conflict with relevant local and national planning policies.

The encouragement of additional residential capacity and variety in Policy 4.2.4 of the London Plan 2021 and Strategic Objectives 1 & 2 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018 was outweighed by the unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the Victorian dwelling, terrace and surrounding townscape.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 4.2.4 of the London Plan 2021Strategic Objectives 1 & 2 of the Sutton Local Plan 2018Local Plan Policies 28 & 30London Plan Policies D3 & D4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

163 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Sutton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed16 October 20233316873
    21 Westmead Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM1 4JT
  2. Allowed21 June 20223291998
    6 Park Hill Road, Wallington, SM6 0SB
  3. Allowed19 November 20213264318
    Helena House, 348-352 High Street, Sutton, SM1 1PU
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266002198
    103 Marlow Drive, North Cheam, SM3 9BD
  5. Allowed15 October 20266009820
    Grass Verge of Sparrow Farm Road, London, KT17 2DF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.