Planning appeal decision
Fieldshead Cottage , Field Head , Glossop , Derbyshire , SK13 8NX
Planning appeal 3276660 at Fieldshead Cottage , Field Head , Glossop , Derbyshire , SK13 8NX (High Peak Borough Council) was dismissed on 1 December 2021 by Inspector Phillips A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the Council's refusal to issue a certificate of lawful use or development was well founded, turning on whether the appellant proved on the balance of probability that the use changed to parking domestic and agricultural vehicles on or before 20 October 2010 and continued without significant interruption for ten years.
conversion of agricultural land on north, west and south of barn, to parking area for up to five cars, two agricultural vehicles
- Authority
- High Peak Borough Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Phillips A
- Postcode
- SK13 8NX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: whether the Council's refusal to issue a certificate of lawful use or development was well founded, turning on whether the appellant proved on the balance of probability that the use changed to parking domestic and agricultural vehicles on or before 20 October 2010 and continued without significant interruption for ten years
- Appeal B: whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt; the effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it; the effect on the character and appearance of the area; and if inappropriate, whether the harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations
What decided it
In Appeal A, the appellant's evidence was insufficiently precise and contradictory to prove on the balance of probabilities the required ten-year continuous use; in Appeal B, the substantial weight given to Green Belt harm was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
The substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness and the significant harm to character and appearance were not clearly outweighed by the limited weight given to the appellant's arguments regarding need for parking, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EQ2Policy EQ3Policy EQ4
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in High Peak
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed12 February 2026600109266 Chunal Lane, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6JX
- Dismissed21 January 20263372294Cote Bank Farm, Unnamed Road From Stubbins Lane To Tithe Barn Farm, Chinley, Derbyshire, SK23 7NP
- Allowed8 September 20253366398Lodge Farm, Caravan Site , Boggard Lane , Charlesworth , Derbyshire , SK13 5HL
- Allowed30 April 20253357581How Green Barn, How Green Farm, Shiloh Road, High Peak, Derbyshire, SK22 4QR
- Dismissed11 April 20253351568Meadows Farm, Ridge Top Lane, Hayfield, High Peak, SK22 2JQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®