Planning appeal decision
Rear of 60 Maple Road, Surbiton, Surrey, KT6 4AE
Planning appeal 3276662 at Rear of 60 Maple Road, Surbiton, Surrey, KT6 4AE (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 31 December 2021 by Inspector Langford-Tejrar K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, particularly whether the proposal conserves or enhances the significance of St Andrews Square Conservation Area.
Erection of four-storey detached building to create a four- bedroom single family dwellinghouse with associated amenity space, off-street car parking (with turntable), bin store, cycle store and associated landscaping
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Langford-Tejrar K
- Postcode
- KT6 4AE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, particularly whether the proposal conserves or enhances the significance of St Andrews Square Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers of the development, specifically in respect of outdoor amenity space and daylight and sunlight
- Whether the proposal would have an unacceptable impact on highway safety, or the residual cumulative impacts on the road network would be severe
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the heritage assets and the unacceptable adverse impacts on living conditions of neighbouring occupiers and future occupiers outweighed the substantial benefit of providing a single family home.
The adverse impacts of granting permission, comprising less than substantial harm to the conservation area and listed building setting and unacceptable impacts on living conditions, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the scheme (provision of a single family home and reduction of antisocial behaviour), when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- London PlanPolicy CS8Policy DM10Policy DM12Policy DM13
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed7 October 2026601191211 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
- Dismissed29 September 2026600998856 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
- Dismissed25 September 2026600907674 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
- Allowed11 August 20266010924271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
- Dismissed3 August 20266007703Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®