Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 January 20223276983

Land next to no. 78 Woodside Road, Woodside, Luton, LU1 4DQ

a new 2 bedroom dwelling with associated parking and amenities

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Couper C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether or not the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal fails to constitute limited infilling in a village because a significant portion of the site comprises open agricultural land that would be enclosed and domesticated as a rear garden, and this harm to Green Belt openness and character and appearance is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 149, 150

Plan policies cited: CBLP Policy SP4, CBLP Policy HQ1, CBLP Policy SP7, Policy Case 8 of the Neighbourhood Plan for Caddington and Slip End 2016 – 2031

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.