Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 October 20213277080

26 Crosshills Mount, Greetland, HALIFAX, HX4 8HS

the installation of decking

Authority
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hitchcock R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at 27 Cross Hill with particular regard to overlooking and loss of privacy

What decided it

The realistic prospect of a fallback position (an unenclosed alternative structure) resulting in potentially worse effects on neighbouring privacy outweighed the minor harm from the approved decking scheme.

The minor harm arising from increased use of the rear garden area and potential overlooking was outweighed by the fallback position of an uncontrolled alternative scheme that could result in worse effects on neighbours' living conditions.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE2 of the Replacement Calderdale Unitary Development Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.