Planning appeal decision
Krown House, Colham Green Road, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3QH
Planning appeal 3277082 at Krown House, Colham Green Road, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3QH (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 10 February 2022 by Inspector Wilson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy.
Proposed rear extension to existing offices to provide COVID-19 staff safe distancing
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
- Inspector
- Wilson L
- Postcode
- UB8 3QH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing moderate harm to openness, with no very special circumstances to outweigh this harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EM2 of The Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 1 – Strategic Policies (2012)Policy DMEI 4 of The Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 2 – Development Management Policies (2020)Policy G2 of the London Plan (2021)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 September 20266010520Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
- Notice varied and upheld29 July 20253363007Land on the West Side of High Street, Harlington, Hayes, UB3 5DW
- Dismissed20 June 20253355798Khayri House, 70 Clifton Gardens, Uxbridge, Hillingdon, UB10 0EZ
- Allowed21 February 20253341154Chandigrah Summerhouse Lane, Harefield, Uxbridge, UB9 6HS
- Dismissed1 November 20243345366Grass Verge Adjacent To 19 Rutters Close, West Drayton, UB7 9AL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®